Home       News        About Us        Links       Site Map    
Naval Shipbuilding Homepage
CATEGORY
News 2013
width=197
Parliamentary News 2013
width=197
Archive 2012
width=197
Archive 2011
width=197
Archive 2010
width=197
Archive 2009
width=197
Archive 2008
width=197
Archive 2007
width=197
Archive 2006
width=197
Archive 2005
width=197
Archive 2004
width=197
Archive 2003
width=197
Parliamentary News 2012
width=197
Parliamentary News 2011
width=197
Parliamentary News 2010
width=197
Parliamentary News 2009
width=197
Parliamentary News - Archive
width=197

 

 

     Parliamentary News 2012

nuclear submarines , 30 January col 424W

Nuclear Submarines

Jeremy Corbyn: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence (1) which locations are being considered as an alternative operating base for the Vanguard class SSBN submarines; (2) what criteria his Department plans to use to evaluate future locations for the operating base of Vanguard class SSBN submarines; [90796]

(3) which Royal Navy sites are equipped to become the operating base of Vanguard class SSBN submarines; [90797]

(4) if he will estimate the likely cost of developing a new operating base for the Vanguard class SSBN submarines. [90798]

Alison Seabeck: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what estimate he has made of the cost of moving (a) T class and (b) Astute class submarines to Plymouth. [90637]

Oliver Colvile: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence whether his Department has made plans for the base porting of Royal Navy nuclear submarines in the case of future independence of Scotland and Scotland becoming a nuclear-free zone. [90644]

Jeremy Corbyn: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence with reference to the possibility of Scottish independence, what assessment he has made of the feasibility of moving Vanguard class SSBN submarines from Faslane to Devonport. [91071]

Peter Luff [holding answers 19, 20 and 23 January 2012]:The Ministry of Defence is not making plans to change the base ports of those classes of submarines currently base-ported at Her Majesty's Naval Base Clyde. The Department does not therefore hold cost estimates or other information that would relate to such changes.

The Government are clear that Scotland benefits from being part of the UK and the UK benefits from having Scotland within it. The Government are not making plans for independence as we are confident that people in Scotland will continue to support the Union in any referendum.

30 Jan 2012 : Column 426W Trident Missiles

Paul Flynn: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what annual service fees are paid to the US Administration for the storage and reprocessing of Trident missiles at the Strategic Weapons Facility Atlantic, Kings Bay, Georgia. [91253]

Peter Luff: Under the Polaris Sales Agreement as amended for Trident, the UK pays the US Department of Defence an annual contribution towards the overall cost of the US Navy's Strategic Weapons Facility at Kings Bay, Georgia.

This contribution, which includes storage and reprocessing work, is based on the UK's share of the overall missile inventory, and amounts to around £12 million a year.



<< Back

 

^ Top

 


Contact Us

Furness Enterprise Ltd,
Lindal Business Park,
London Road,
Lindal in Furness,
Cumbria LA12 0LD

Tel: +44 (0)1229 820611
Fax: +44 (0)1229 827226

Email: sklosinski@furnessenterprise.co.uk or hknowles@furnessenterprise.co.uk
Downloads

KOFAC Sept Newsletter
Keep Our Future Afloat
The Future Aircraft Carrier
More Downloads

All downloads are in Adobe pdf format

       Find KOFAC on Facebook
Testimonials

"Barrow remains an untapped source of production capability and could... play a significant role in the coming shipbuilding programme."

Source: Rand, page 153 The UK's Naval Shipbuilding Industrial Base (2005), Report to UK MoD

Copyright 2013 © Furness Enterprise. All rights reserved in association with provider Furness Internet Ltd.
Disclaimer